🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where Black people are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the accounts of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the recent season we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to remove African American heritage and legacy from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's first executive orders focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the situation of the current era. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a professor at an educational institution, put it best when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an foundation that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not avoid political issues, and provides room for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the bygone era when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Establishments who mark it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that face all if anti-racism is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.