🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a draft bill that include lowering the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

It comes amid broader worries about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Last month, global health authorities issued a warning that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be reduced to less than half “following international suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities actually suggests a caution must occupy at least half of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for multiple violations “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

In the letter, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary claims the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but claims that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We live in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and gather the crop and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are dying … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The company operates its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which allow for relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The company was “not opposed to regulation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that young individuals should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, adding that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which involves increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.